In the words of Claudio Fernandez-Araoz, Senior Advisor,
Egon Zehnder, ‘A typical job interview is a conversation between two liars.’ Most
job interviews are fake encounters. The job seeker is trying to project certain
aspects of her personality and capabilities while masking other aspects that
may not be as much favorable to the situation. The interviewer presents the
job in certain color and content to make it look attractive to the job seeker.
Professional job seekers anticipate most of the typical interview questions and
if one is not adept in anticipating these, there are professional sites which
help one prepare for a job interview. Same way, experienced interviewers
anticipate typical responses of candidates.
Even the best job interview carries a very low predictive
validity. To appreciate this one needs to only look at the ever shortening average
tenure of professional CEOs. It is logical to assume that most new CEOs are
selected after several rounds of interviews by board members after the
‘research and espionage’ operations by a reputed executive search firm. Despite
all that friendly encounters and fat search fees the success rate of senior
appointees is much to be desired. Yet, most companies consider the job
interview as the most critical and often the last hurdle before releasing a job
offer.
Why is interview still the holy cow of selection process?
Nobody would want to kill an industry which thrives on this
often very subjective process in the selection chain of events. I don’t know
who invented this tool or when was it first used as a selection technique. It
can safely be assumed that when the job seekers were mostly illiterate or
semi-literate the easy way to get direct information regarding the candidate was
probably a personal meeting. It is also safe to assume that in the
pre-industrial era of gild system an able bodied youngster is taken as an
apprentice or protégé and he is given a job based on successful learning on the
machine or in the workshop. In this case a walk on the floor and a chat in the
room were good last steps in the decision process.
What if we do away with job interviews altogether?
Based on all information provided by the candidate in her CV,
data available in the social or public domain, the tests or questionnaires
responded to by the candidate a company may offer a job to the candidate,
skipping the fake encounters. Well this requires serious analysis of data by
hiring managers and the recruitment managers. My guess is that the end outcome may not be drastically
different in most cases!
At the least, we will avoid many rounds of ‘hide and seek’ and
reduce the recruitment cycle time. Experiment this no-interview selection for
campus hires and then progressively try this for more and more senior profiles.
Pick up more real life credentials from experienced candidates in multiple
formats- audios, pictures and videos-match these with other information on the
social networks, do serious reference checks and go ahead and take the
decision.
Sounds far-fetched and utopian? Very much. Worth
experimenting? May be.
Reality bites 😉
ReplyDelete